Ranking scope and methodology review
Review the applicable requirements and existing institutional records.
RANKINGS
Times Higher Education Rankings
Research, teaching and institutional performance analysis.
Discuss this serviceWhere this service fits
Who it is for
Universities considering relevant THE ranking exercises.
What we help prepare
Institutional data, documentation, internal processes and evidence relevant to the selected framework.
Start with a readiness review
Understand your current position, identify missing records and agree on the next steps before preparing the submission.
The applicable framework, scope and deliverables are confirmed for each institution. Assessment decisions rest with the relevant authority.
How IIQA supports the preparation process
Teaching and research data review
Work with the institutional team to organise the relevant records, review gaps and document agreed actions.
Research quality and international outlook analysis
Work with the institutional team to organise the relevant records, review gaps and document agreed actions.
Institutional submission checks
Work with the institutional team to organise the relevant records, review gaps and document agreed actions.
Benchmarking and gap identification
Work with the institutional team to organise the relevant records, review gaps and document agreed actions.
Action planning and follow-up
Work with the institutional team to organise the relevant records, review gaps and document agreed actions.
A clear set of working deliverables
Readiness & gap report
An organised review of the current stage and the gaps requiring attention.
Discuss scopeDocumentation & evidence review
A structured checklist connecting requirements with institutional records.
Discuss scopeAction & follow-up plan
Responsibilities, target dates and a review process for identified actions.
Discuss scopeRelated institutional evidence
Build a service-specific case study
Institution name · Framework · Engagement period · Scope of support · Verified outcome
Use an approved project record that matches this service. Workshop appreciation belongs in the workshop evidence collection.
View evidence collectionQuestions institutions ask
How is the scope decided?
IIQA and the institutional team review the relevant framework, current stage and expected deliverables before defining the engagement.
Does the institution retain responsibility for its data?
Yes. The institution should verify and approve its records, submissions and statements.
Can our faculty and administrative team receive training?
Relevant workshop topics can be planned around the institutional team’s needs.
How are timelines and fees confirmed?
The scope, schedule and commercials are confirmed through a proposal based on institutional requirements.